Assessing the efficacy of machine learning algorithms for syncope classification: A systematic review

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-1-2024

Abstract

Syncope is a transient loss of consciousness with rapid onset. The aims of the study were to systematically evaluate available machine learning (ML) algorithm for supporting syncope diagnosis to determine their performance compared to existing point scoring protocols. We systematically searched IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, and Elsevier for English articles (Jan 2011 - Sep 2021) on individuals aged five and above, employing ML algorithms in syncope detection with Head-up titl table test (HUTT)-monitored hemodynamic parameters and reported metrics. Extracted data encompassed subject count, age range, syncope protocols, ML type, hemodynamic parameters, and performance metrics. Of the 6301 studies initially identified, 10 studies, involving 1205 participants aged 5 to 82 years, met the inclusion criteria, and formed the basis for it. Selected studies must use ML algorithms in syncope detection with hemodynamic parameters recorded throughout HUTT. The overall ML algorithm performance achieved a sensitivity of 88.8 (95 CI: 79.4–96.1), specificity of 81.5 (95 CI: 69.8–92.8) and accuracy of 85.8 (95 CI: 78.6–92.8). Machine learning improves syncope diagnosis compared to traditional scoring, requiring fewer parameters. Future enhancements with larger databases are anticipated. Integrating ML can curb needless admissions, refine diagnostics, and enhance the quality of life for syncope patients. © 2023 The Author(s)

Keywords

adolescent, adult, age, aged, bibliographic database, Calgary score, Calgary Syncope Symptom Score, Canadian Syncope Risk score, child, classification algorithm, comparative effectiveness, data extraction, data integration, decision tree, diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic test accuracy study, disease risk assessment, Evaluation of Guidelines in Syncope Study, faintness, feature selection algorithm, female, gaussian naive bayes, head-up tilt test, hemodynamic parameters, human, intermethod comparison, k nearest neighbor, learning algorithm, logistic regression analysis, machine learning, male, modified Calgary score, multinomial naive bayes, performance indicator, predictive value, publication, quality control, quality of life, random forest, Review, sensitivity and specificity, signal processing, support vector machine, systematic review, Web of Science

Divisions

medicinedept

Publication Title

MethodsX

Volume

12

Publisher

Elsevier

Additional Information

Cited by: 0; All Open Access, Green Open Access

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS